Clinton, Massachusetts



Weather in:
Clinton

Current Conditions
Fair
Temperature: 42.6 °F

Humidity: 67 %
Wind Speed: 5 mph WSW
Pressure: 29.74 "

Dew Point: 32 °F
Gusts: 11 mph WSW
Rain Today: 0.00 "






link to this page from your site or blog!:

  • Clinton News
    Local news for Clinton, MA continually updated from thousands of sources on the web.

  • Clinton Classifieds
    Local classifieds for Clinton, MA

    • free zumba
      Try ZUMBA for free. Reserve your spot now @ www.youdanze.com - offer valid for a limited time only. eXperience the hottest dance fitness craze on the planet. Burn calories/lbs to salsa, cha cha, merengue, bachata, hip hop, reggaeton and more. Instructor: Dancing since 5, Glenda has more than 15 ye...

    Source: Freebase – The World's Database
    Freely licensed under CC-BY.

    Questions Possibly Related to Clinton, Massachusetts

    Provided By Y! Answers

    Did you know as governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney signed a healthcare bill similar to Hillary Clinton's?
    Question:
    The government mandates he put into place raised healthcare prices and increased state government spending on healthcare by 25% in Massachusetts. The story actually came out today from Reuters and Mitt Romney did support the reform. It's just hypocritical for him to criticize Hillary's plan when he's done the same thing. He's continually trying to change his image so he can win elections.


    Answer:
    We had his dad as Govenor of Michigan, We didn't want him eather. I guess what goes around, comes around. <}:-})

    Why did the homosexual affair of Bill Clinton and George W. Bush end during the mid ninties.?
    Question:
    Is it true they will marry in Massachusetts as soon as Bush's term is up. I hope they live on the Cape.


    Answer:
    it ended to make room for ellen and anne heshe's 90's relationship

    Could this be a bad week for Mitt Romney and a good week for Hillary Rodham Clinton?
    Question:
    --being that the Patriots, the team in his home state, Massachusetts, lost to the team in John McCain's home state, Arizona. And the fact that he will probably lose Super Tuesday? --Would the New York Giants' Super Bowl victory help her win?


    Answer:
    I believe it does, it all falls in order. This was Super Bowl 42 President Bush is President number 43 Hillary Clinton would be President 44

    How silly is Clinton's argument that Obama won't carry "big states" because she beat him in their primaries?
    Question:
    So all of a sudden states like California, New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts and Pennsylvania that have been voting Democratic forever will vote for Bush Jr. in the form of John McCain? Is she smoking crack?


    Answer:
    hillary has no argument, and she knows this. she is just trying to put her own SPIN on her losses. the states you've named will be blue come november. and obama has already shown that he has the ability to turn some red states blue. john kerry and al gore lost because they couldn't do this. republicans will not be voting for hillary come november. they're only doing so now in the open primaries and caucuses so that they can keep the chaos going on in the democrat party.

    When have we NOT had a governor running for president?
    Question:
    This year we have three senators running for president, but for a couple dozen years (at least) there has been at least ONE governor in the race. Working backwards: Bush (Texas), Clinton (Arkansas), Dukakis (Massachusetts), Reagan (California), et cetera. How far do we have to go before there were no governor’s in the race? Bonus points for identifying other candidate’s professions.


    Answer:
    I'm not sure about the primaries, but working backwards starting before the ones you listed. 1972 was Nixon/McGovern. Nixon was President, McGovern a Senator. 1968 was Nixon/McCarthy. Nixon was a former Senator and VP (and I believe had unsuccessfully run for Governor of California), McCarthy was a Senator. 1964 was Johnson/Goldwater -- Johnson was President, Goldwater a Senator. 1960 was Kennedy/Nixon -- Kennedy was a Senator, and Nixon was a former Senator and VP. (He tried for Governor after losing that election.) 1956 and 1952 were both Eisenhower/Stevenson. Ike was President in 1956, and a retired General in 1952, Stevenson a Governor (of Illinois). So, the 1960 - 1972 general elections had no governors in the races.

    If Romney wins the GOP presidential nomination will Massachusetts remain a blue state or turn red?
    Question:
    if Clinton becomes the Democratic nominee? if Obama becomes the Democratic nominee?


    Answer:
    He is very popular in Massachusetts and I'd wager he'd win that state if in the General election regardless of the democratic nominee. I don't think that means that Massachusetts would turn to a red state however. Sometimes red canidates win in blue states and blue canidates win in red states.

    Anybody else, using their brain, figured out why Clinton is saying she is ahead for Dem leaning States?
    Question:
    Let's add the states up that went Democrat in the last 4 Presidential elections to be fair. Rhode Island, Ohio, Tennessee, New Mexico, Arizona, California, Arkansas, New York, New Jersey, New Hampshire, Nevada, Massachusetts all for Clinton adding up to 196 votes using the 2004 Delegate map provided below. Washington, Oregon, Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, Illinois, Maryland, Vermont, Connecticut, Maine, Hawaii, Wash. D.C, Delaware, Louisiana, Georgia, Kentucky, Colorado, and Maine all for Obama adding up to 147 votes using the 2004 Presidential delegate map provided below. Kentucky, West Virginia, Pennsylvania and Montana have not voted yet. Michigan and Florida have not had their votes counted yet. http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/electoral. college/ http://www.uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php?f=0 &year=1992 http://www.uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php?f =0&year=1996 Counting on States to vote Democratic that have not voted so in the last 4 Presidential elections is unrealistic.


    Answer:
    Thats why she should be the nominee

    Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, the 2004 Democratic presidential nominee, endorsed Sen. Barack Obama?
    Question:
    CHARLESTON, S.C. - Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, the 2004 Democratic presidential nominee, endorsed Sen. Barack Obama for the White House Thursday in a timely slap at Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton as well as his own vice presidential running mate. WOW Obama is on fire! What do you think?


    Answer:
    I think it does not matter in the long run what John Kerry thinks or any famous endorser for that matter. As NH proved it only matters what the voters thinks

    Will super delegates have to sign statements if Obama gets his wish?
    Question:
    Obama says the super delegates should vote according to how the people of their state did. Should the super delegates have to sign a statement saying that is what they will do? If even even one person (not counting Bill Clinton)refuses to sign, will this create havoc? I am asking this because Bob Kerry and Ted Kennedy who endorsed Obama are from Massachusetts which Hillary won. I think they may renege and vote for Obama. If this is this case, is what Obama's calling for just creating a hornet's nest now?


    Answer:
    Sounds like obama wants a written guarantee that he will be the dem. nominee. If he does not get the nod, he will create a big problem. I cant figure out why anyone would want someone like him as president.

    Ok, so which one Clinton or Obama would fine parents who don't have healh care for their children?
    Question:
    Read the transcript from tonite's debate and answer: CLINTON: It is not enough to say, "Let's come together." We know we're going to have to work hard to overcome the opposition of those who do not want the changes to get to universal health care. You know, when I proposed a universal health care plan, as did Senator Edwards, we took a big risk, because we know it's politically controversial to say we're going to cover everyone. And you chose not to do that. You chose to put forth a health care plan that will leave out at least 15 million people. That's a big difference. When I said we should put a moratorium on home foreclosures, basically your response was, well, that wouldn't work. And, you know, in the last week, even President Bush has said we have to do something like that. I just believe that we've got to look hard at the difficult challenges we face, especially after George Bush leaves the White House. CLINTON: The world will breathe a sigh of relief once he is gone. We all know that. (APPLAUSE) But then we've got to do the hard work of not just bringing the country together, but overcoming a lot of the entrenched opposition to the very ideas that both of us believe in, and for some of us have been fighting for, for a very long time. You know, when I took on... (APPLAUSE) When I took on universal health care back in '93 and '94, it was against a firestorm of special interest opposition. I was more than happy to do that, because I believe passionately in getting quality affordable health care to every American. I don't want to leave anybody out. I see the results of leaving people out. I am tired of health insurance companies deciding who will live or die in America. (APPLAUSE) BROWN: All right, Senator Clinton, thank you. Senator Obama, please respond. (APPLAUSE) OBAMA: Well, I think that Senator Clinton mentioned two specific issue areas where we've got some differences. I'm happy to debate those, which is what I think should be the focus of this campaign. We both want universal health care. When I released my plan a few months later, we were in a debate and Senator Clinton said we all want universal health care. Of course, I was down 20 points in the polls at the time, and so my plan was pretty good. It's not as good now, but my plan hasn't changed. The politics have changed a little bit. We both -- 95 percent of our plans are similar. We both want to set up a system in which any person is going to be able to get coverage that is as good as we have as members of Congress. And we are going to subsidize those who can't afford it. OBAMA: We're going to make sure that we reduce costs by emphasizing prevention. And I want to make sure that we're applying technology to improve quality, cut bureaucracy. Now, I also want to make sure that we're reducing costs for those who already have health insurance. So we put in place a catastrophic reinsurance plan that would reduce costs by $2,500 per family per year. So we've got a lot of similarities in our plan. We've got a philosophical difference, which we've debated repeatedly, and that is that Senator Clinton believes the only way to achieve universal health care is to force everybody to purchase it. And my belief is, the reason that people don't have it is not because they don't want it but because they can't afford it. And so I emphasize reducing costs. (APPLAUSE) And as has been noted by many observers, including Bill Clinton's former secretary of labor, my plan does more than anybody to reduce costs, and there is nobody out there who wants health insurance who can't have it. OBAMA: Now, there are legitimate arguments for why Senator Clinton and others have called for a mandate, and I'm happy to have that debate. But the notion that I am leaving 15 million people out somehow implies that we are different in our goals of providing coverage to all Americans, and that is simply not true. We think that there's going to be a different way of getting there. One last point I want to make on the health care front. I admire the fact that Senator Clinton tried to bring about health care reform back in 1993. She deserves credit for that. (APPLAUSE) But I said before, I think she did it in the wrong way, because it wasn't just the fact that the insurance companies, the drug companies were battling here, and no doubt they were. It was also that Senator Clinton and the administration went behind closed doors, excluded the participation even of Democratic members of Congress who had slightly different ideas than the ones that Senator Clinton had put forward. And, as a consequence, it was much more difficult to get Congress to cooperate. OBAMA: And I've said that I'm going to do things differently. I think we have to open up the process. Everybody has to have a seat at the table. And most importantly, the American people have to be involved and educated about how this change is going to be brought about. The point is this, you know, we can have great plans, but if we don't change how the politics is working in Washington, then neither of our plans are going to happen, and we're going to be four years from now debating once again how we're going to bring universal health care to this country. (APPLAUSE) BROWN: All right, we've got some time constraints here, so we've got to take another real quick break. Stay with us. We've got a lot more ahead. You can compare the candidates on the issues any time; just go to our Web site, Cnnpolitics.com. A lot more ahead here at the University of Texas. We'll be right back. (COMMERCIAL BREAK) (APPLAUSE) BROWN: An enthusiastic crowd here at the University of Texas. Welcome back to the Texas Democratic debate. Let's get right to it. Jorge Ramos with the next question. RAMOS: Senator Clinton, yesterday you said, and I'm quoting, "One of us is ready to be commander in chief." Are you saying that Senator Obama is not ready and not qualified to be commander in chief? CLINTON: Well, I believe that I am ready and I am prepared. And I will leave that to the voters to decide. But I want to get back to health care, because I didn't get a chance to respond after Senator Obama finished. No, let me finish, Jorge... RAMOS: But I would like to come back... CLINTON: This is a significant difference. You know, Senator Obama has said it's a philosophical difference. I think it's a substantive difference. He has a mandate for parents to be sure to ensure their children. I agree with that. I just know that if we don't go and require everyone to have health insurance, the health insurance industry will still game the system. Everyone of us with insurance will pay the hidden tax of approximately $900 a year to make up for the lack of insurance. (APPLAUSE) And you know, in one of our earlier debates, John Edwards made a great point. It would be as though Social Security were voluntary. Medicare, one of the great accomplishments of President Johnson, was voluntary. (APPLAUSE) I do not believe that is going to work. So it's not just a philosophical difference. CLINTON: You look at what will work and what will not work. If you do not have a plan that starts out attempting to achieve universal health care, you will be nibbled to death, and we will be back here with more and more people uninsured and rising costs. (APPLAUSE) BROWN: All right. We appreciate that you want to make a point, Senator Obama. We have limited time, so I would like Jorge to move on to another subject or we're going to be out of time. (CROSSTALK) OBAMA: Well, I understand. But I think that Senator Clinton made a... (LAUGHTER) You know, she's making a point, and I think I should have the opportunity to respond very briefly. And I'll try to make... BROWN: Very briefly, absolutely. OBAMA: Number one, understand that when Senator Clinton says a mandate, it's not a mandate on government to provide health insurance, it's a mandate on individuals to purchase it. And Senator Clinton is right; we have to find out what works. OBAMA: Now, Massachusetts has a mandate right now. They have exempted 20 percent of the uninsured because they have concluded that that 20 percent can't afford it. In some cases, there are people who are paying fines and still can't afford it, so now they're worse off than they were. They don't have health insurance and they're paying a fine. (APPLAUSE) In order for you to force people to get health insurance, you've got to have a very harsh penalty, and Senator Clinton has said that we won't go after their wages. Now, this is a substantive difference. But understand that both of us seek to get universal health care. I have a substantive difference with Senator Clinton on how to get there. BROWN: All right, Senator Clinton? CLINTON: Wait a minute, no, this is too important. This is the number one issue that people talk to me about. You know, when a mother grabs my arm and says, "I can't get the operation my son needs because I don't have health insurance," it is personal for me. CLINTON: And I just fundamentally disagree. You know, Senator Obama's plan has a mandate on parents and a fine if parents do not... OBAMA: That's right. CLINTON: ... insure their children. OBAMA: That's right. CLINTON: Because he recognizes that unless we have some kind of restriction, we will not get there. OBAMA: There's a reason. CLINTON: He's also said that if people show up at a hospital sick, without health insurance, well, maybe at that point you can fine them. We would not have a social compact with Social Security and Medicare if everyone did not have to participate. I want a universal health care plan. (APPLAUSE) OBAMA: Now, that's -- that mother -- that mother who is desperate to get health care for her child, will be able to get that health care under my plan. Point number one. Point number two, the reason a mandate for children can be effective is we've got an ability to make affordable health care available to that child, right now. OBAMA: There are no excuses. If a parent is not providing health care for that child, it's because the parent's not being responsible, under my plan. And those children don't have a choice. But I think that adults are going to be able to see that they can afford it, under my plan; they will get it, under my plan. And it is true that, if it turns out that some are gaming the system, then we can impose, potentially, some penalties on them for gaming the system. But the notion that, somehow, I am interested in leaving out 15 million people, without health insurance, is simply not true. BROWN: All right. Jorge... CLINTON: We disagree on that.


    Answer:
    Obama is the one fining. I am shocked he did not deny it.

    Is Mitt Romney running for the nomination of the wrong party?
    Question:
    Hillary Clinton has proposed the exact same Universal Health Insurance scheme that Romney instituted while governor of Massachusetts. Is this Massachusetts liberal running for the nomination of the wrong party?


    Answer:
    Romney needed to play more liberal to get elected in Massachusetts and needs to play more conservative to get the GOP nomination.

    Does anyone know where I can find a summation of the book "Undying Glory"?
    Question:
    Any internet source that has a general summation or note about the book 'Undying Glory: The Story of the Massachusetts 54th Regiment' by Clinton Cox. It would be much appreciated. Thank You.


    Answer:
    try sparknotes.com or cliffnotes.com

    Does Clinton argument toward superdelegates of success in big states make sense?
    Question:
    Supporters of Hillary Clinton has stated that if Obama does not lock up the democratic nomination that she should get votes by superdelegates because she won the big states (new york, california, massachusetts, texas). However one republican supporter said that he finds it more impressive that more people overall voted for obama than mccain in some of the red states such as kansas, colorado, iowa. He also said that if Obama is the nominee he will easily win new york, california, and massachusetts which are almost always blue states. And most likely none of the dem candidate will win texas because texas is extremely conservative and their race or gender would impact them in texas.


    Answer:
    She has won smaller states AND most of the big states so far, with Texas getting a question mark....and that will be the determinant. Obama has not won a single big state---and you know as I know---whoever wants to be president HAS to win Ohio....well, Clinton won Ohio......

    What are the ways Mrs Clinton can win???
    Question:
    There are two mathematical realities that matter to both campaigns. First, winning delegates does not necessarily mean winning the popular vote. Mrs Clinton's victories in a pile of big states including New York, New Jersey, California, Texas, Ohio and Massachusetts have kept her within striking distance of taking the popular vote from Obama Second, no matter how well Mrs Clinton does in the remaining state contests, come June - at the end of the primary and caucus season - Mr Obama will have more pledged delegates than she will Mr Obama also has a clear upper hand with super-delegates so long as he has the majority of pledged delegates and the majority of the popular vote. So how can she win???


    Answer:
    It will come down to the superdelegates, which will probably create a crisis in the democratic party because by having superdelegates choose who gets the nomination, every single democrat who voted in the primaries will have been disenfranchised. It won't be pretty!

    Did you know George W. Bush is related to Hilary Clinton & Queen?
    Question:
    And he's related to John Kerry and ... etc. They're all related to each other!! Just goes to show not anyone can become the President of the United States; you need the right connections. Hillary Rodham Clinton, and Barbara Pierce Bush (Dubya's Mom), are both 8th Great Granddaughters of Robert Lovering, born 06 Sept 1620 in Boston, Massachusetts (http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread328237/pg1) Bush is closely related to the king of Albania and has kinship with every member of the British royal family and the House of Windsor. He is related to 20 British Dukes, the 13th cousin of Britain’s Queen Mother, and of her daughter Queen Elizabeth. He is 13th cousin once removed from Prince Charles and has direct descent from King Henry III, Charles II, and Edward I of England. Through the House of Windsor and King Henry III, the Bush’s and Bill Clinton are genetically related as well. (http://boards.ancestrylibrary.com/topics.royalty.links/212/mb.as hx) He's not related to Anton Le Vey. The rumour was he was related to Alistair Crowley, but that was a hoax.


    Answer:
    The elite have been inbreeding for many generations. They are all related somehow.

    Will the Republicans start campaigning for Hillary Clinton since a new poll says she'll lose in 2008?
    Question:
    Clinton slips behind Republican foes in new poll Democrat Hillary Clinton would lose to all major Republican White House candidates, according to a hypothetical election matchup poll Monday, reversing her months of dominance over potential 2008 challengers. The Zogby International poll was the latest sign that withering attacks on the former first lady were chipping away at her opinion poll leads just 38 days before the Iowa caucuses, the first party nominating contests. In the new survey, Clinton trailed Senator John McCain 42 percent to 38 percent, former New York mayor Rudolph Giuliani by 43 percent to 40 percent and former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney by 43 percent to 40 percent. She also lagged behind former Arkansas Republican governor Mike Huckabee by 44 to 39 percent, and former Senator Fred Thompson by 44 to 40 percent in hypothetical general election matchups. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=071126191523 .oorozvs5&show_article=1


    Answer:
    Wow mempto is one insane idiot. Yes Republicans are campaigning for Hillary. Peoples beliefs are so strong on her they will not switch votes. She is the one candidate who has no undecideds. More then half of America has said they will not vote for her for any reason. She is the ultimate divider. I personally am for her winning the Democratic ticket. Republicans could run Dan Quayle and win

    The Real Winner aka HILLARY CLINTON!?
    Question:
    If you look at the states that Hillary has carried all along they are the big and huge states while Obama has carried the itty bitty states. In the end if he doesn't realize most of the country lives in the huge states then he doesn't stand a chance. Winning places like Idaho and North Dakota isn't Presidential, he needs to pick it up or just quit. This is the big leagues. Hillary's BIG STATE Support and WINS: - Florida (Massive) - California (Massive) - New York (Massive) - Massachusetts (Semi-Massive) - New Jersey (Semi-Massive) - Michigan (Semi-Massive) Obama's BIG STATE Support and WINS: - Illinois (Massive) - Georgia (Semi-Massive) *Florida & Michigan have no delegates at this point but most pundits and political analysts believe it will be extremely likely that should the race between Clinton and Obama be close, the DNC will authorize them. One of the arguments in support of this is the DNC would rather accept this action than see the party split* Question: What's your thoughts on the correlation between the big states and the itty bitty one's?


    Answer:
    I know, by the way, I like your descriptor terms.

    NY Feminists Accuse Kennedy of Betrayal...Where were they when Bill Clinton was ABUSING women?
    Question:
    http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8UFRQV01&show_article=1 NEW YORK (AP) - The New York chapter of The National Organization for Women accused Sen. Edward M. Kennedy of betraying women with his endorsement of Barack Obama, prompting the organization's national office to come to the Massachusetts senator's defense. "Women have just experienced the ultimate betrayal," NOW's New York State chapter said in a scorching rebuke. "Senator Kennedy's endorsement of Hillary Clinton's opponent in the Democratic presidential primary campaign has really hit women hard." If any married CEO would have done what Bill Clinton did during WORKING hours, in his office, with a subordinate - THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN FIRED!


    Answer:
    Clinton "abused" Paula Jones and settled out of court for 750,000 in a sexual harrasment lawsuit and NOW never stood up for her and instead stood up for Clinton. They follow Teddy even though he assisted his nephew in leaving his compound in Vero Beach Florida after he raped a girl. Teddy also killed Mary Jo Kapnecknie in a drunk driving incident and NOW has always backed him. But he backs Obama and NOW feels betrayed.... sounds like NOW has been betraying women for years and they finally get a taste of their own medicine.

    Should Deval Patrick be told he must switch support to Hillary?
    Question:
    Deval Patrick is a DNC super delegate and governor of Massachusetts, and close personal friend and lender of speeches to Obama. Shouldn't he be supporting Clinton, she won his state. On CNN Emanuel Cleaver has stated that John Lewis has been badgered into switching to Obama, because his constituency supported him. So if that is how they are playing the game, the Deval Patrick should come over to Clinton, as should Kennedy and Kerry. I agree that the super delegate by design should vote their conscious, but the Obama camp thinks they should vote according to what the popular vote is.


    Answer:
    But Randell...he is black

    What is illegal immigartion doing to this country ?
    Question:
    GM to cut 30,000 US jobs GM to close a dozen North American manufacturing facilities Ford to cut about 4,000 salaried jobs in North America North Carolina: Clinton Electronics Plant To Lay Off 250 Workers Executives say the facility costs more money to run than it brings in, so, they are moving the jobs to Mexico and to other sites North Carolina: Transportation Security Administration says it will eliminate the jobs of 54 screeners in Charlotte Indiana: Local Chrysler Foundry To Close; 800 Jobs To Be Lost Montana: Stimson workers in shock - Laid-off employees fear looming bills, hope for rehires, retraining Mississippi: Textron announces 60 more layoffs at Greenville plant Massachusetts: Hard-hit professionals working 'survival jobs' years after layoffs New Jersey: PSEG to cut jobs at plants in South Jersey Arkansas: Acxiom: New Technology to Help Earnings, May Mean More Layoffs US-based Kimball Electronics to set up China manufacturing plant Georgia: Candy maker to move to Mexico, leaving 200 joblessKodak Swings to a Loss Again, Targets 10,000 More Job Cuts ATA Airlines Cutting 450 Jobs Amid Outsourcing Plans HP Expected to Announce Massive Layoffs I think this country is in Serious trouble what do you think of this turn of events? Then define what Recession means ?


    Answer:
    I agree with you. It is so sad with what is happening to OUR country. It just truly annoys me when they play the MINORITY card. Unfortunately, in America, the AMERICANS are the minority. I do have to comment on an answer that was left earlier. about how we end up better off in the long run. NO WE DON"T. You don't see us getting a new car, a new home, and a job just handed to us do you? We all work our tails off everyday to sometimes just to pay the bills, because well all of the high paying jobs were givin' to the illegals. Now, i really don't see how that is being considered us coming out on top. And for them getting jobs that only pay little to nothing, oh and are having to be a maid to the rich and be treated how ever, that cuz they know they have to take it cuz they are ILLEGALS. They have to or they get deported. Which is no big deal cuz they will just swim or jump a fence again and do it all over. But the next time they will decide to move further north and work for a certain company, cuz that is all this company hires to build their stores, and kidnap some girl and get caught. But guess what, because they are ILLEGALS, they get a slap on the wrist, get sent back to Mexico, and do it all over again. Is anyone seeing a vicious cycle here. cuz its truly getting really sickening. SEND THEM ALL HOME AND GIVE AMERICA BACK TO THE AMERICANS!!!!